BP Energy Center; Anchorage, Alaska

Architect: Koonce Pfeffer Bettis, Inc.
Anchorage, Alaska

Jury Comments
· Special – great plan.
· Simply – beautifully
· Has interaction with forest – interstitial space between building and forest are complementary

Photo credit: Kevin Smith

Uri Village, Kwanghwa Island, Korea

Architect: Byoungsoo Cho + Helen Pank
Seoul, Korea

Jury Comments
· Created world for the people
· Really quite good
· Euclidian geometry

Photo credit: Jongoh Kim

Architect: Byoungsoo Cho Architects
Seoul, Korea

Jury Comments
· Sketch drawings quite nice.
Units-simple planning – Gratifying.
· Plans really nice. Fresh sensibility, very light.
· Roof vs. Landscape. Residential living spaces very strong

Photo credit: Jongoh Kim

Fauntleroy Residence, Seattle, Washington

Architect: Suyama Peterson Deguchi
Seattle, Washington

Jury Comments
· Relationship between existing and new buildings.
· Restrained, not overblown.
· Plan/elevations simple
· Deck lips out and same thickness at roof
· Thin contrast in materials/ spine move experience
· Restraint – budget – held together tightly
· Gratified – not wild originality – doing what they do very well

Photo credit: Paul Warchol / Lara Swimmer

Lantern Wonderland, Victoria Park, Hong Kong

Architect: dwp CL3
Central, Hong Kong

Jury Comments
· James Turrell likes lantern that glows
· Single space, single use, serves purpose
· Framing – ground texture
· Inventive use of bamboo and other materials
· Integrated

Photo credit: Wu Kin Yat

Loyola Jesuit Center, Portland, Oregon

Architect: Hennebery Eddy Architects Inc
Portland, Oregon

Jury Comments
· Good solid all around project.
· Works very well.

Photo credit: Photography by eckert & eckert

Fisher Pavilion at Seattle Center, Seattle, Washington

Architect: The Miller/Hull Partnership, LLP
Seattle, Washington

Jury Comments
· Almost Neo Brutalist piece of work
· Acts more as civic building
· It disappears, very well considered.

Photo credit: Steve Keating

Robert & Margrit Mondavi Center for the Arts, Davis, California

Architect: BOORA Architects
Portland, Oregon

Jury Comments
· Institutional building, very light. Provides civic face, gateway to University.
· Performing art space – conventional. Systems/energy use interesting.
· Public space almost enough to carry project

Photo credit: Jeff Goldberg / Esto Photographics, Inc.

Willamette Drinking Water Treatment Plant, Wilsonville, Oregon

Architect: The Miller/Hull Partnership, LLP
Seattle, Washington

Jury Comments
· Landscape is good.
· Vertical vs. Horizontal – tracks along slightly sloping section.
· Human scale vs. concrete piers
· Nice in big scale.

Photo credit: eckert & eckert

Skyspace Pavilion, UW, Seattle, Washington

Architect: Donnally Architects in collaboration with James Turrell
Seattle, Washington

Jury Comments
· Urbanistic, Elegant, Great project/great artist

Photo credit: Lara Swimmer

Adidas Village, Portland, Oregon

Architect: BOORA Architects
Portland, Oregon

Jury Comments
· The company re-habited hospital.
· Recycle, relation to link of road
· Within city, not on new site

Photo credit: David Papazian
Photography, Inc.

Pacific Artists Dance Center, Portland, Oregon

Architect: Richard Brown Architects AIA LLP, Portland, Oregon

Jury Comments
· Very simple. Doesn’t try to be anything it isn’t.
· So simple – one space – one cleanup – one canopy –The power of ONE
· Recycle/not dumped
· Careful eye to know when to stop
· No budget – came up with something unforgettable
· Someone made something out of nothing

Photo credit: Bruce Forster / Michael Mathers

Ode to Roses, Portland, Oregon

Architect: Fletcher Farr Ayotte PC
Portland, Oregon

Jury Comments
· Really has great features
· Neighborhood – is a different place now
· Straight forward interior
· Project has no negative elements

Photo credit: Brian Foulkes