![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
The 2006 awards for architectural excellence were presented at the AIA Northwest and Pacific Region Annual Conference held recently in Hong Kong.
The Northwest and Pacific Region of the AIA is the largest and most diverse of all the AIA regions: it includes Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, Hong Kong, and now Japan.
The jury for this awards program included the Advisory Group members for the AIA Committee on Design that gathered in Phoenix last month at the AIA Knowledge Community Assembly, except that current Chairman David Brems did not participate and newly designated AG member Tom Howorth did. Jurors are from New York, Washington, Memphis, Los Angeles, and Oxford, Mississippi—not quite as diverse as the NW&P Region, but still pretty diverse.
We were tremendously impressed by the high quality of the project submittals, a fact owing, no doubt, to the Region’s threshold of eligibility: to qualify, all of the projects submitted were required to have been recognized previously with an AIA award at another component level. This is not a prerequisite in any of the jurors’ home regions, and it established a high standard for all of the submissions. In the jury’s opinion, the projects selected are the best of a very good bunch of projects.
These projects, as you might expect also exhibit a great range deriving from the range within the region and the types of projects submitted. Although each project, as awards programs always say, was judged individually and not in comparison with other projects submitted, we believe the resulting awards represent the full range of the submittals.
Jurors for the competition included: Michael Ross, FAIA,
Hammel,Green & Abrahamson; Carol Rusche Bentel, FAIA, Bentel & Bentel
Architects/Planners; Louis Pounders, FAIA, ANF Architects; David Greenbaum,
FAIA, SmithGroup, Inc.; and Tom Howorth, FAIA, Howorth and Associates Architects.
Permission to use photos is granted for news and feature purposes.
|
|
Schuchart Residence, Seattle, Washington Architect:
|
Jury Comments:This project thoroughly integrates the architecture with the landscape; the structure is well-connected to the site: controlled, hard and apparently urban on the street side; open and naturalistic onto the golf course behind, with water elements flowing through and tying the two together. The jury especially liked the clarity of the plan and the massing – three rectilinear blocks set into a transparent volume. We admired its clarity and demonstrated restraint; nothing was overdone. |
|
| Marion Oliver McCaw Hall, Seattle,
Washington Architect: |
Photographer: |
Jury Comments: This project successfully integrates interior and exterior Lobby spaces with great visual affect. The jury appreciated the lighted scrims at the urban street, which create dramatic, almost theatrical, energy at the entrance. The scrims and entrance echo the functions and purpose of the building; they create a distinct physical landmark, an urban “front door” to the opera. This building reaches out to the community. The project is well integrated into the fabric of the Seattle Center and holds it’s own among the surrounding strong architectural pieces—a wonderfully sensitive civic project. |
|
Jury Comments: A rigorous site plan created comfortable and well
proportioned open spaces—and a building that is simultaneously
hard-edged and humane. The building blocks are well-proportioned,
and the interlocking components shape a variety of spaces in between—an
essential quality for a campus project. Successful day-lighting created
pleasant and well-lit interior volumes. The jury noted the contrast
of smooth concrete surfaces with corrugated and textured interior
surfaces. Overall it was well-conceived with sensitive composition
of surfaces. |
Seminar II, The Evergreen State College, Olympia,
Washington
Architect: Mahlum Architects, Olympia, Washington Photographer: Lara Swimmer, Kaie Wellman |
| US Courthouse, Seattle, Washington Architect: Photographer:
|
|
|
Jury Comments: This project successfully integrates extensive sustainable strategies into a complex building type set in an urban environment. The entrance plaza, with its monumental public staircase, provides welcome relief in the dense urban setting. The building’s organization is very clear. The realization of security requirements through the integration of public art and landscape elements is especially impressive and perhaps more than a little ironic. This public building succeeds as a civic icon for democracy and stability in the community. |
|
|
Nathan Hale High School Performing Arts Center, Seattle, Washington Architect: Photographer:
|
Jury Comments: |
|
|
Suzzallo Library Renovation, Seattle, Washington Architect: Photographer: |
|
Jury Comments: |
|
|
Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington Architect: Photographer:
|
Jury Comments: This building offers a welcoming experience for
cancer patients and their families. The project, a relatively modest
addition to a much larger older structure, thoroughly transforms the
face of the existing bldg in a positive way. It raises the bar for
healthcare projects. Its generous natural light and serene outdoor
spaces provide a consoling environment to offset the difficult experiences
of patients and families using the building—a worthy and well-considered
objective. |
|
|
Niemeyer Arts Center, Oregon City, Oregon Architect: Photographer:
|
|
|
Jury Comments: This project is successful as an arrival gateway for commuters to
the campus, but it also shapes the interior campus space very well.
The welcoming promenade leads to and transitions into interesting
interstitial spaces along the building’s interior street. This
is a multi-functional building offering a variety of spaces, which
should be quite valuable in a community college setting. The exterior
is respectful of and responsive to the scale of the campus. |
|
|
Temporary Event Complex, Portland, Oregon
Architect: |
Jury Comments: Despite being a temporary construction, this project
successfully celebrates the arts. The jury liked the transparency
and definition of spaces; the ephemeral quality of the construction
was appropriately suited to its purpose. Overall it illustrates a
well-conceived juxtaposition of spaces defined by the translucent
pavilions of the outdoor spaces and the solid block of the adjoining
warehouse. |
|
Adrenaline, Happy Valley, Hong Kong Architect: Photographer: |
|
|
Jury Comments: The vitality and continuity of the electric ribbon defines the entire project; it organizes and links all the elements into a coherent whole. The project combines beautifully detailed interior spaces with high-energy imagery. It seems a perfect expression for the race track. We want to go there! |
|
|
C-Shaped Metal Roof House, Bokpo-ri, South Korea Architect: Photographer: |
Jury Comments: The conceptual diagram was very clear. The bold
site strategy created a garden that enhanced the building and controlled
views. The pristine, humble materials create a warm domestic interior
environment. Especially noteworthy is the integration of the surprise
entry into the garden landscape. |
|
| Camerata Music Studio and W-Residence,
Paju, South Korea
Architect: Photographer: |
|
Jury Comments: The design features a mix of live/work environments;
the combination of public and private space informs the plan and section
organization. On the interior, the suspended solid wood ceiling and
floor assembly provides an effective acoustic solution that infuses
the space below with dramatic tension, and baffles the light from
above, highlighting the texture and color of the concrete walls. |
|
|
Nanea Clubhouse, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii Architect: Photographer:
|
Jury Comments: This project responds to the beautiful Hawaiian
landscape; the roof forms offer a striking image of the surrounding
terrain; the architect shows great confidence in using literal forms.
The sustainable strategies are well integrated into the design concept.
One of the project’s strongest aspects was almost indiscernible
in its presentation: that the majority of the building program is
buried underground, topped with lava rock and fountain grass, merging
the building with the traditional landscape.
|
|
North Cascades Environmental Learning Center, Diablo Lake, North Cascades National Park, Washington Architect: Photographer:
|
|
|
Jury Comments: The site plan was executed with great care and sensitivity, adjusting to the many site features worthy of preservation. The jury liked the scale and variety of the open spaces formed by the site plan, which is a response to the topography and the pattern of disturbed land. The campus was well integrated into the landscape. The jury also felt that the forest metaphors evoked in the architectural expression were deft and appropriate.
|
|
|
|
Hawaii Gateway Energy Center, Kailua-Kono, Hawaii Architect: Photographer:
|
|
Jury Comments: This project makes a bold—almost iconographic—statement
in the landscape about renewable energy. It is a great demonstration
piece and an impressive technical achievement. The architecture displays
obvious concern for the environment and becomes a symbol—a teaching
tool for sustainability.
|
|
2003
Award of Honor
2003 Award
of Merit
2003 Award of Citation
2002
Award of Honor
2002 Award
of Merit
2001
Award of Honor
2001 Award
of Merit
A historical file of design awards winners is maintained in
the Regional Office.
|
Home | Regional Directors
and Board of Representatives | Northwest Region
Component Offices |
| Architectural Schools | Governance
Policies | Awards | NW
Regional Conference |
| Bylaws | About Us | Calendar
|